Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Extends break-in-service consideration for firefighter retirement benefits.
The problem
Firefighters face gaps in service continuity affecting retirement eligibility. Current rules may not account for service breaks, impacting retirement benefits and financial security for firefighters.
The proposal
The bill extends how break-in-service is considered for firefighter retirement calculations, allowing more flexible eligibility rules for retirement benefits.
The impact
Firefighters with service breaks gain better retirement benefits. Federal and local governments may face increased pension costs. Current and retired firefighters see rule changes.
Firefighters with service gaps get fairer retirement benefits. This helps those who took breaks for health, family, or other reasons. It improves financial security for retiring firefighters.
More flexible retirement rules make firefighting careers more attractive. Better retirement benefits help keep experienced firefighters in the job longer.
Acknowledges that firefighters' service is valuable even with breaks. Treats service gaps more fairly and compassionately.
Current rules may unfairly penalize firefighters for unavoidable service breaks. This bill corrects that problem in pension calculations.
Extending retirement benefits will cost federal and local governments more money. Pension systems may need more funding to cover expanded benefits.
Without official estimates, the exact cost is unknown. This could strain state and local budgets if costs are high.
More flexible break-in-service rules may create confusion. Different situations could be treated differently, making administration harder.
The bill has no official summary, making detailed analysis difficult. Full implications and specific changes remain unclear.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.