Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 378.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Burgess Owens (R-UT)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Restricts certain educational content and teaching methods in schools.
The problem
Concerns that some school curricula contain ideological content that some view as inappropriate indoctrination of students rather than objective education.
The proposal
The bill's specific provisions are not detailed in available information. It appears designed to limit certain educational approaches, though exact mechanisms require full text review.
The impact
Students, teachers, school districts, and parents would be affected by changes to curriculum requirements and teaching standards in public schools.
Supporters argue parents should have visibility and input on classroom content. They believe this ensures education reflects community values and priorities.
Proponents suggest restricting non-academic content keeps classroom time focused on traditional academics like math, reading, and science.
Advocates contend clear guidelines create uniform educational standards across districts and states, reducing variation in what students learn.
Critics worry restrictions limit educators' professional judgment and ability to teach controversial topics important for critical thinking and civic understanding.
Opponents note terms like 'indoctrination' are subjective, making enforcement difficult and potentially leading to inconsistent application or self-censorship.
Critics argue excessive restrictions reduce discussion of diverse perspectives, history, and social contexts necessary for well-rounded education and informed citizenship.
Schools may face increased costs and complexity implementing new content restrictions and oversight requirements across all curricula and materials.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.