Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires Congress to approve the names of federal buildings instead of letting agencies decide alone.
The problem
Federal agencies currently name buildings without formal Congressional approval. There may be disagreement about who deserves building names or how decisions are made.
The proposal
The bill gives Congress the power to authorize names for federal buildings. Agencies would need Congressional approval before officially naming buildings.
The impact
Federal agencies lose naming authority. Congress gains decision-making power. The public may have more input through their elected representatives.
Elected representatives would have a say in naming federal buildings. This could make the process more transparent and accountable to voters.
Having one set of Congressional rules for all federal buildings could create fairness. Standards would apply equally across different agencies.
Congressional debates about building names could include broader public discussion. More people might have the chance to suggest who should be honored.
Getting Congressional approval for building names could take much longer. Federal agencies might face delays when they need to name new buildings.
Congress would spend time on building names instead of major laws. This could distract from more important national issues.
Congress could deadlock over controversial names. Disagreements between parties might prevent any names from being approved.
Agency professionals who understand building purposes lose decision-making power. Local communities familiar with their buildings also have less influence.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.