Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Clarifies how Title IX education rules apply to schools and students.
The problem
Schools and courts interpret Title IX differently, creating confusion about what the law requires regarding education access and fairness.
The proposal
Provides clear definitions and guidelines for how Title IX applies to schools, students, and educational programs nationwide.
The impact
Schools must follow consistent rules. Students may see changes in programs and policies. Education officials get clearer guidance.
Schools will understand Title IX rules more clearly instead of guessing. This helps them follow the law correctly. Fewer lawsuits may result from misunderstandings.
Clear rules ensure all students get fair treatment in school. Everyone knows what schools must provide. Educational opportunities become more consistent across states.
When rules are clear, schools spend less money on lawyers and court cases. Schools can use money for education instead of legal battles.
All schools follow the same rules regardless of location. This fairness means a student's rights don't depend on which state they live in.
Strict national rules might not fit every community's needs. Schools with unique situations may struggle to comply. Local control over education policies decreases.
Title IX changes spark strong disagreements between different groups. The bill's specific language might favor one side over another. This could reduce political support.
Schools must update policies, train staff, and possibly change programs to match new rules. This requires money and time. Small districts may struggle with costs.
Clear rules sometimes create unexpected problems in real classrooms. New definitions might not cover all situations schools face. Changes could harm groups the law didn't intend to affect.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.