Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents government officials with national security access from trading stocks based on secret information.
The problem
Officials with access to classified national security information may trade stocks unfairly using secret knowledge before the public learns it.
The proposal
Creates rules stopping national security officials from buying or selling stocks based on classified information they learn through their jobs.
The impact
Government officials lose ability to profit from secret information. Investors gain fairer stock market conditions. National security work becomes more restricted.
Regular investors compete fairly when officials cannot use secret information to trade stocks. This increases trust in financial markets. Everyone plays by the same rules.
Officials focus on national security instead of personal wealth gains. This improves decision-making. Officials serve the country rather than personal financial interests.
Using secrets for personal profit risks exposing them. This law discourages that behavior. It strengthens security of sensitive information.
Clear rules make it easier to catch and prosecute officials who break the law. This deters bad behavior.
Proving someone traded based on classified information is difficult. Separating legal trades from illegal ones requires investigation. Officials may dispute charges.
Restrictions on stock trading might discourage talented people from joining national security jobs. People might prefer private sector jobs without restrictions.
The bill text is missing, so it's unclear what counts as using classified information. Rules that are too vague create confusion and legal challenges.
Most stock trading violations already break existing laws. This law may only add rules on top of current rules without stopping new problems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.