Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes the Crossett Experimental Forest as a designated research and management area in Arkansas.
The problem
The Crossett Experimental Forest lacks formal federal designation and protection status. This creates uncertainty about long-term management goals and research continuity for the forest.
The proposal
Designates Crossett Experimental Forest in Arkansas as an official experimental forest under federal management. Establishes management framework and authorizes resources for research activities.
The impact
Affects forest researchers, timber industry, conservation groups, and local communities in Arkansas. Clarifies land management practices and provides funding for ongoing forest studies.
Provides formal status and dedicated funding for long-term forest research. Enables scientists to study forestry practices, climate adaptation, and ecosystem management more effectively.
Establishes clear management guidelines balancing conservation and responsible use. Creates a model for other forests nationwide.
Brings federal investment and research jobs to the region. Supports educational opportunities through research partnerships.
Formal designation can improve ecosystem conservation efforts. Protects forest biodiversity and natural resources long-term.
Experimental designation may limit commercial logging opportunities. Could reduce timber industry revenue in the region.
Requires government funding for management and research operations. Adds to federal budget expenditures.
Formal designation restricts certain private or commercial activities. May limit local development and land use flexibility.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.