Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Orders a federal study on gambling disorder health effects and treatment needs.
The problem
Gambling disorder affects millions of Americans but lacks comprehensive federal research on its health impacts, treatment effectiveness, and public health needs.
The proposal
Directs federal agencies to conduct a study examining gambling disorder's health effects, current treatments, prevention strategies, and recommendations for public health responses.
The impact
Affects people with gambling problems, their families, healthcare providers, and policymakers who need better data to address gambling disorder as a public health issue.
A federal study will gather reliable data on how gambling disorder harms people's mental and physical health. This information helps doctors and public health officials understand the real scope of the problem.
Research findings can identify which treatments work best for gambling addiction. Better evidence helps clinics and hospitals provide more effective care to patients.
Policymakers need facts to make good decisions about gambling regulation and prevention. This study provides evidence that federal and state leaders can use.
The study can identify which groups struggle most with gambling problems. This helps target prevention and treatment resources to people who need them most.
Federal research studies cost taxpayer money. Some argue these funds could be spent elsewhere or that states should handle this research instead.
Research takes months or years to complete. People struggling with gambling disorder need help now, not after a long study finishes.
A study only provides information—it doesn't automatically create new treatments or programs. Congress would need separate bills to actually implement changes based on findings.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.