Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to prevent discrimination in how the federal government awards contracts to companies.
The problem
Some believe federal contract awards may unfairly favor or disadvantage certain groups or businesses based on identity rather than merit and qualifications.
The proposal
The bill would establish rules to ensure government contracts are awarded based on ability and qualifications, not on protected characteristics of business owners.
The impact
Federal contractors, small businesses, and companies competing for government work would face new requirements when bidding for contracts.
Focusing on qualifications and performance could ensure government gets best value. Taxpayer money might be spent more efficiently on contracts with highest-quality providers.
Removing identity-based factors in contracting could create fairer rules for every business owner. All companies would compete on same standards regardless of ownership background.
Reducing factors considered in award decisions could streamline how government evaluates bids. This might speed up contract awards and lower administrative costs.
Removing identity-based contracting preferences might hurt businesses owned by women, minorities, and veterans who previously received support. These groups often face lending and networking barriers that preferences helped address.
Federal agencies currently use some identity-based contracting to meet diversity targets. This bill could limit tools agencies use to build diverse supplier networks.
The bill might face court challenges if it conflicts with federal affirmative action policies or civil rights protections. Litigation could create uncertainty for contractors.
Without seeing specific language, it's unclear exactly what practices would be banned. Different interpretations could create confusion for federal agencies and contractors.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.