Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Requires Medicare Advantage plans to disclose their medical loss ratios more transparently.
The problem
Medicare Advantage insurers may not be transparent enough about how much money they spend on actual patient care versus administrative costs and profits.
The proposal
The bill mandates clearer public reporting of medical loss ratios (MLR), showing what percentage of premium money goes to healthcare services versus other expenses.
The impact
Medicare Advantage patients, insurers, regulators, and policymakers gain clearer information about insurance company spending patterns and operational efficiency.
Seniors and patients get clearer information about how insurance companies use their premium dollars. This transparency helps people make informed choices about their Medicare plans and hold insurers accountable.
Government agencies can better monitor whether insurers meet minimum standards for spending on actual patient care. This reduces the risk of insurers prioritizing profits over medical services.
Clear MLR data allows comparison shopping between plans. Better information encourages competition on value, potentially leading plans to improve services or lower costs.
Detailed reporting makes it easier to identify unusual spending patterns or potential misuse of premium funds. This protects the Medicare program and taxpayers.
Insurance companies must invest in new reporting systems and processes to meet enhanced transparency requirements. These administrative costs could be passed to consumers through higher premiums.
Detailed MLR disclosure may reveal proprietary business information to competitors. Smaller insurers might struggle more than large national plans with these new requirements.
MLR data is complex and technical. Even with transparency, many patients may not understand the information or may misinterpret the data, limiting real impact.
Transparency alone doesn't guarantee lower prices or better care. Without enforcement mechanisms or regulatory authority to act on the data, reporting may have minimal practical effect.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.