Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates training programs to help workers provide mental health support in their communities.
The problem
Many communities lack enough trained mental health professionals. People struggle to access mental wellness support. There is a shortage of workers who can help.
The proposal
The bill establishes training and certification programs for community mental wellness workers. It funds education to prepare people for these roles. It helps communities build local mental health support.
The impact
Mental health workers, communities, and people needing mental health care are affected. Training programs expand job opportunities. Access to mental health services may improve.
Training community workers brings mental health support closer to people. People in underserved areas may get help more easily. Local jobs are created in mental health.
The bill creates new job opportunities in communities. People can learn new skills and earn income. This supports workforce development.
Community workers can handle some mental health needs before they become emergencies. This reduces pressure on emergency rooms and hospitals. Resources go further.
More trained workers mean more people can get mental health support. This helps prevent problems from getting worse. Communities become healthier.
Training programs cost money from taxes. The bill requires federal funding for these programs. Long-term costs are unclear.
Community workers are not full therapists or doctors. There may be questions about training standards. Different regions might have different quality levels.
Community workers might be overwhelmed with high demand. Workers may need ongoing support and training. Turnover could be high.
The bill has no official summary available yet. Specific training requirements and standards are not clear. Implementation details are unknown.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.