Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Strengthens U.S. Wi-Fi technology against foreign adversaries through domestic development and security standards.
The problem
Foreign countries may gain control over Wi-Fi technology standards, threatening U.S. communications security and economic competitiveness in wireless networks.
The proposal
The bill promotes American Wi-Fi research, development, and adoption of secure standards to reduce reliance on foreign technology and strengthen national infrastructure.
The impact
Technology companies, internet providers, and consumers benefit from stronger security. The U.S. government gains more control over Wi-Fi standards and domestic tech advancement.
Reduces dependence on foreign Wi-Fi technology that could have backdoors or vulnerabilities. Helps protect communications networks from foreign interference and cyberattacks.
Encourages U.S. companies to develop and lead Wi-Fi technology. Creates jobs and economic growth in the domestic technology sector.
Supports building stronger, more reliable wireless networks across America. Strengthens the backbone of modern communications and internet access.
Gives America more influence over global Wi-Fi standards. Prevents other countries from setting rules that disadvantage U.S. technology companies.
Developing competing Wi-Fi technology is expensive. Taxpayers may fund research that benefits large corporations more than average Americans.
Creating separate U.S. standards might fragment the global Wi-Fi market. Could make equipment more expensive and less compatible worldwide.
Other countries might retaliate against American tech companies if U.S. limits their Wi-Fi products. Could harm U.S. businesses selling technology globally.
No official summary available makes it hard to know exactly what the bill requires. Specifics matter for understanding real costs and benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.