Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes cooperative institutes to manage public lands and natural resources.
The problem
Public lands need better management through partnerships between government and local communities. Existing systems may not effectively coordinate resource protection and use.
The proposal
Creates cooperative institutes that bring together federal agencies, states, tribes, and private groups to jointly manage and research public lands and natural resources.
The impact
Federal agencies, state governments, Native American tribes, local communities, and land managers gain new ways to collaborate on public land decisions and conservation.
Communities and tribes get more say in how nearby public lands are managed. This can lead to decisions that reflect local needs and knowledge.
Multiple partners share the financial burden of land management and research. This could reduce government spending while maintaining land care.
Institutes can combine research from universities, government, and nonprofits. Better science may improve conservation and resource management outcomes.
Partnerships allow quicker responses to land issues like wildfires or invasive species. Coordination between groups reduces delays in decision-making.
Getting many partners to agree can slow down land management decisions. Complex partnerships may create bureaucratic obstacles instead of fixing them.
When multiple groups share control, it's harder to know who is responsible for failures. Citizens may struggle to hold the right organization accountable.
The bill does not clearly specify how institutes will be funded. Insufficient funding could prevent effective implementation and operation.
Partners with different goals might clash over land use priorities. Disagreements between conservation, recreation, and development interests could create deadlock.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.