Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to improve suicide prevention programs and mental health support services nationwide.
The problem
Suicide rates remain high in the United States. Many communities lack adequate mental health resources and suicide prevention programs to help at-risk individuals.
The proposal
The bill would establish or expand suicide prevention initiatives, likely including funding for mental health services, training programs, and support resources for vulnerable populations.
The impact
Mental health patients, at-risk individuals, healthcare providers, and communities would gain access to improved suicide prevention services and mental health support resources.
Suicide prevention programs can identify at-risk people early and provide help before crises occur. More funding and resources could reduce suicide rates across the country.
Expanding programs increases availability of counseling, crisis hotlines, and treatment options. Communities with better mental health infrastructure see better health outcomes.
Suicide is a major public health problem. Federal action acknowledges the severity and demonstrates commitment to reducing preventable deaths.
Training programs help doctors, nurses, and counselors recognize warning signs and respond effectively. Better-prepared providers deliver improved patient care.
New programs require federal funding, which increases government spending and potentially raises taxes or redirects money from other programs. Budget impact depends on funding amount.
Creating nationwide programs is complex and time-consuming. Inconsistent state-level resources and coordination problems could limit effectiveness across different regions.
Expanded mental health monitoring and information sharing between agencies raises privacy questions. Citizens may worry about how personal health data is collected and used.
Without official bill text or summary, actual provisions remain unclear. The bill could have unintended consequences or ineffective approaches depending on final language.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.