Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires health insurance coverage for people waiting for trial without bail.
The problem
People accused of crimes but not yet tried often cannot afford bail and wait in jail. They may lose health insurance during this time, causing medical and financial hardship.
The proposal
The bill would require states to provide or maintain health insurance coverage for people held pretrial without bail, ensuring continuous medical care access.
The impact
Pretrial detainees gain health coverage continuity. States and insurers face new costs and administrative requirements. Criminal justice and healthcare systems must coordinate.
Pretrial detainees maintain access to necessary medications, treatments, and preventive care. This reduces emergency room visits and complications from untreated conditions.
Continuous health coverage prevents expensive emergency care and hospitalizations. Better health outcomes for detainees could reduce recidivism and reentry complications.
Ensures healthcare access regardless of bail status. Promotes dignity and equal treatment in the criminal justice system.
Poor and marginalized individuals disproportionately detained without bail. This bill reduces health disparities caused by pretrial detention.
States must pay for expanded health coverage. Without federal funding details, this could strain state budgets and divert resources from other programs.
States and jails must coordinate with insurance systems, create enrollment processes, and maintain coverage during custody transitions. Implementation challenges could be significant.
No official summary provided, so funding source and federal support level remain unknown. States may face unfunded mandates.
If coverage only applies to detained individuals, courts might be less motivated to release detainees quickly, potentially increasing jail overcrowding.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.