Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
SWIPES Act addresses crime and law enforcement issues through new policies.
The problem
The bill responds to concerns in crime and law enforcement that require legislative attention and policy updates.
The proposal
The bill modifies crime and law enforcement procedures, though specific provisions require committee review and public summary.
The impact
Law enforcement agencies, individuals in criminal justice system, and communities affected by crime policies will experience changes.
If the bill strengthens law enforcement tools or strategies, it could help reduce certain types of crime. Communities might experience improved public safety outcomes. Enhanced enforcement mechanisms may deter criminal activity.
New procedures could streamline law enforcement operations and reduce bureaucratic delays. This might help police agencies respond faster to incidents. More efficient processes could save resources for departments.
The bill may introduce new tools or methods to protect communities. Enhanced coordination between agencies could improve response times. Better enforcement could make neighborhoods safer.
Crime enforcement bills sometimes raise civil liberties questions. New law enforcement powers could potentially affect privacy or due process protections. Citizens might worry about increased government authority.
New law enforcement programs require funding and resources to operate effectively. Agencies may need training, equipment, or personnel increases. Taxpayers could face increased costs.
Crime legislation can have unforeseen effects on communities or specific groups. Enforcement changes might be applied unevenly across different areas. Certain populations could be disproportionately affected.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.