Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Automatically creates investment accounts for babies using Social Security birth information.
The problem
Many Americans lack access to early investment opportunities. Starting investments young helps build wealth over time, but requires account setup.
The proposal
The bill would automatically establish investment accounts for all babies registered through Social Security's birth program without requiring parental action.
The impact
All newborns would receive automatic accounts. Parents and families would be affected by account management decisions. Financial institutions would handle administration.
Starting investments at birth gives money decades to grow through compound interest. This could help reduce wealth gaps between families. Automatic enrollment removes barriers to entry.
Parents could opt out or modify accounts as needed. The bill doesn't force families to keep accounts they don't want. Flexibility balances automatic enrollment with parental control.
New investment accounts increase money flowing into financial markets. This benefits investment firms and potentially boosts economic activity. Could create jobs in financial services.
Automatic enrollment ensures poor and middle-class babies get accounts too. This reduces inequality in investment access. Wealthy families already have these opportunities.
Using birth data to create accounts raises privacy questions. The government links personal information across systems. Data security risks exist if breaches occur.
Automatic accounts create government-managed investments without explicit consent. Parents lose control over initial financial decisions for their children. Opting out requires active steps.
Market investments can lose money, especially short-term. Children's accounts could decline in value during downturns. Not all families can afford market risk.
The Social Security Administration and financial firms need new systems to manage millions of accounts. Setup costs could be substantial. Ongoing management requires resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.