Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Makes it easier for people with disabilities to run for elected office.
The problem
People with disabilities face barriers when trying to become candidates for office. These barriers include lack of accessible voting places, campaign materials, and support.
The proposal
The bill removes obstacles that prevent people with disabilities from running for elections. It requires accessible campaign resources and voting accommodations.
The impact
People with disabilities gain better access to run for office. Voters with disabilities get more candidate choices. Election systems become more accessible.
Removes barriers so people with disabilities can run for office. More diverse candidates mean elected officials better represent all communities. This strengthens democracy.
Requires campaigns and elections to be accessible to people with disabilities. Accessible voting sites help people with mobility issues. Better materials help people with vision and hearing disabilities.
When elections are more accessible, all voters can participate more easily. Accessible polling places help elderly people and parents with strollers too. Voter participation increases.
Removes unfair barriers that prevent qualified candidates with disabilities. Ensures hiring and candidate rules are fair. Protects civil rights.
Making elections and campaigns accessible requires funding. States and counties need money for accessible facilities and materials. Taxpayers may pay more for election administration.
Different types of disabilities need different accommodations. Getting all systems accessible takes time and planning. Some communities may struggle to comply quickly.
Without official summary details, the exact requirements are unknown. Unclear rules might confuse election officials. Vague language could lead to disputes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 227
Clergy Act
HR 5345
Improving Social Security’s Service to Victims of Identity Theft Act
HR 5284
Claiming Age Clarity Act
HR 10243
Protecting Elders From Government Error Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.