Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to make produce treated as medicine subject to healthcare accountability rules.
The problem
Produce marketing sometimes makes health claims without proper verification or oversight. Current regulations may not adequately address produce marketed with medicinal properties.
The proposal
The bill would establish accountability measures for produce marketed with health or medicinal benefits, likely requiring substantiation of claims and regulatory oversight through healthcare mechanisms.
The impact
Produce sellers, farmers, retailers, and consumers would face new rules. Health claims on produce would require proof. Costs for compliance and testing may increase.
Prevents misleading health claims on produce. Ensures consumers get accurate information before buying. Helps people make informed choices about their food.
Establishes uniform rules across the produce industry. Creates consistency in how health claims are verified. Reduces confusion in the marketplace.
Legitimate produce sellers can differentiate from misleading competitors. Builds consumer trust in produce with real health benefits. Protects reputation of honest sellers.
Small farmers and producers must spend money on testing and documentation. Compliance could be expensive, especially for small operations. May increase food prices for consumers.
New healthcare-style rules could slow down produce sales and distribution. Creates paperwork and administrative requirements for farmers. May discourage innovation in produce marketing.
Defining what counts as a health claim on produce is difficult. Natural nutrition facts might be misclassified. Could restrict legitimate nutritional information.
Existing produce marketing practices may need restructuring. Some products might be pulled from shelves during transition. Could create short-term supply issues.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.