Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires federal courts to follow existing immigration laws and rules strictly.
The problem
Concerns that some federal courts have not consistently applied immigration laws as written by Congress.
The proposal
Establishes requirements for federal courts to interpret and enforce immigration laws according to their plain text and existing legal rules.
The impact
Affects immigration judges, federal courts, immigrants seeking legal status, and immigration enforcement agencies.
Could ensure all federal courts apply immigration laws the same way. This might reduce confusion about what the law actually requires.
May provide immigrants and legal representatives with more predictable outcomes. People would know what courts are likely to decide based on written law.
Ensures courts follow what Congress actually wrote rather than interpreting laws differently. This respects the role of elected lawmakers.
Removes judges' ability to consider unique situations or unfair outcomes in individual cases. Strict rules might lead to harsh results in deserving cases.
Stricter legal requirements could slow court processing. Immigration cases might take longer as judges follow rigid procedures.
The bill's title and language suggest changes to judicial interpretation, but specifics are unknown without the full text. Actual impacts depend on exact requirements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.