Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Extends temporary protected status for Ukrainian nationals in the United States.
The problem
Ukrainian nationals with temporary protected status face potential loss of legal residency when their current designations expire, creating uncertainty about their ability to remain in the U.S.
The proposal
The bill designates Ukraine under immigration law section 244 to allow Ukrainian nationals to continue receiving temporary protected status, ensuring their continued legal presence and work authorization.
The impact
Ukrainian immigrants and their families gain extended legal status and work rights. U.S. employers relying on Ukrainian workers maintain labor access. Immigration agencies manage additional TPS processing.
Ukrainians can remain in the U.S. without fear of deportation. Families stay together and children can continue school. People can plan their futures more securely.
Employers retain trained workers and avoid hiring disruptions. Businesses benefit from experienced staff. The economy avoids productivity losses from workforce changes.
The U.S. provides refuge to people fleeing war in Ukraine. It demonstrates commitment to helping allies during crisis. Other nations may follow similar approaches.
Protected status holders can work legally and pay taxes. They contribute to Social Security and local economies. Government collects revenue from their employment.
Processing TPS applications requires resources and staff time. Agencies need funding for background checks and documentation. Administrative costs increase for the government.
Some argue expanded immigration could compete with domestic workers for jobs. Wages in certain sectors might face downward pressure. Competition for entry-level positions could increase.
Temporary status lacks permanent solution; people remain in legal limbo. Future administrations could change TPS designations. Long-term certainty is not guaranteed.
Expanded TPS populations may need education, healthcare, and housing services. Local communities bear some service provision costs. Public resources get stretched in high-immigration areas.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
HR 9382
To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to link together applications of family members throughout the NEXUS application process, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.