Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to improve weather forecasting and wildfire management through science and technology.
The problem
Extreme weather events and wildfires cause significant damage and loss of life. Better forecasting and prevention tools are needed to protect communities.
The proposal
The bill would fund research, improve weather prediction systems, and support wildfire management programs through federal science agencies and grants.
The impact
Communities facing extreme weather and wildfires, scientists, emergency responders, and taxpayers would be affected through new programs and research funding.
Improved forecasting systems could give people more time to prepare for dangerous weather. This could save lives and reduce injuries from storms and floods.
Better tools and research may help prevent or reduce the spread of wildfires. This protects communities, forests, and wildlife from fire damage.
Funding for research could lead to new discoveries in weather science. American scientists and companies could develop better technology.
Better forecasting helps emergency responders plan and respond faster. This can reduce response times and save more lives.
The bill requires federal funding, which increases government spending and the budget deficit. Taxpayers would pay for these programs through taxes.
Without an official summary, it is hard to know exactly what the bill does. Citizens cannot easily understand where money goes or how it helps.
Government programs sometimes waste money or fail to reach goals. Results may not match the amount of funding spent.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.