Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates grant program for teams responding to childhood trauma in crime prevention.
The problem
Adverse childhood experiences like abuse and neglect often lead to criminal behavior. Current systems don't adequately address trauma's role in crime.
The proposal
Establishes Adverse Childhood Experiences Response Team grant program under the 1968 Crime Control Act to fund specialized teams addressing childhood trauma.
The impact
Law enforcement, schools, social services, and at-risk youth benefit from trauma-informed crime prevention approaches and earlier intervention services.
Focuses on preventing crime by treating childhood trauma early rather than only punishing criminal behavior later. This approach may reduce crime rates over time.
Brings together law enforcement, schools, and social services in one effort. Better coordination means more effective help for vulnerable children.
Trauma-informed response teams use research-backed methods proven to help children. This increases chances of real success in prevention.
Preventing crime is cheaper than prosecuting and incarcerating offenders. Early intervention could save money on criminal justice systems.
Grant programs cost taxpayer money with no guarantee of success. Congress would need to approve substantial new spending.
Bill details aren't public yet, making it unclear how success will be measured or if funding will actually reduce crime.
Creates new federal program that increases government reach into schools and communities. Some worry this overextends government authority.
Coordinating multiple agencies is difficult and time-consuming. Local areas may lack trained personnel to run these teams effectively.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.