Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a federal grant program to support law enforcement agencies with crime prevention and community safety initiatives.
The problem
Local law enforcement agencies lack sufficient federal funding for crime prevention programs and community-based initiatives to reduce criminal activity effectively.
The proposal
Establishes the ACERT Grant Program authorizing federal grants to state and local law enforcement for crime prevention, community policing, and public safety projects.
The impact
Law enforcement agencies, communities, and crime victims potentially benefit through improved crime prevention resources and services.
Provides federal funding to help police departments hire officers, purchase equipment, and implement crime prevention programs. This can improve public safety in communities with limited local budgets.
Supports programs that build relationships between police and communities. These initiatives can reduce crime and increase trust between residents and law enforcement.
Grants allow communities to address their specific crime challenges with tailored solutions. Local agencies can direct funds toward their most pressing public safety needs.
Reduced crime can attract businesses and investment to communities. Safer neighborhoods may increase property values and economic activity.
New federal grant programs increase government spending and add to the national debt. Taxpayers fund these programs through federal taxes.
Grant awards may favor larger or better-connected law enforcement agencies over smaller jurisdictions. Rural and underserved communities might receive less funding.
Without specific accountability standards, it is unclear how well grant funds reduce crime or improve community safety. Programs may not deliver promised results.
Grant applications and reporting requirements create paperwork and staffing costs for local agencies. Small departments may lack resources to apply for or manage grants.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.