Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 554.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Returns land to the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe in Washington state.
The problem
The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe lost access to ancestral lands. These lands are important for the tribe's culture, economy, and way of life.
The proposal
The bill transfers specific land parcels to the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. This restores tribal ownership and control of traditional territories.
The impact
The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe gains land for cultural practices and economic development. Local communities and current land users may see changes in land management.
The bill supports the tribe's right to govern and develop their own lands. This strengthens tribal independence and allows decisions based on tribal values and needs.
Returning ancestral lands honors the tribe's history and connection to the region. The tribe can restore traditional practices and pass cultural knowledge to future generations.
Land ownership creates opportunities for tribal business development and employment. The tribe can develop resources in ways that benefit their community members.
Tribal management often includes conservation practices developed over generations. This may improve environmental protection and natural resource management in the region.
People or entities currently using the land may lose access or face changes. This could affect local residents, businesses, or existing land leases and agreements.
Transferring land requires legal work, surveys, and administrative processes. These costs could be significant and may create delays in completion.
County or city governments may lose tax revenue from the transferred lands. Communities depending on that revenue may need to adjust budgets.
Without a detailed summary, specific acreage, locations, and conditions remain unclear. This makes it difficult to assess full scope and local impacts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.