Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 674.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Transfers federal land to the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians.
The problem
The Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians seeks to acquire federal land for tribal purposes, likely for economic development, housing, or cultural preservation.
The proposal
The bill authorizes the transfer of specified federal land to the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians for their use and control.
The impact
The Shingle Springs Band gains land ownership and control. Federal government loses land management responsibility. Local communities and economies near the transferred land are affected.
Transfers land directly to the tribe, increasing their sovereignty and ability to make decisions about their own territory. This supports tribal self-governance and independence from federal control.
The tribe can use the land for housing, businesses, or other economic projects. This may create jobs and revenue for tribal members.
Tribal lands can be used to protect cultural sites, preserve traditions, and maintain indigenous heritage. This strengthens tribal identity and community cohesion.
The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs favorably reported the bill, indicating some legislative support for the land transfer.
The federal government permanently loses land it previously managed. This reduces federal holdings and may limit future federal use of the property.
Without a full bill summary, it is unclear whether the land transfer includes environmental cleanup costs or ongoing financial obligations that taxpayers might bear.
Local governments or residents near the transferred land may oppose the change in land management. State and local tax revenue could be affected.
No official summary is available, making it difficult for the public to fully understand the bill's scope, the land location, or the specific terms of transfer.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.