Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 553.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Allows Mashpee Wampanoag and Wampanoag Aquinnah tribes to lease land for up to 99 years.
The problem
Current federal law limits leases on tribal reservation land to shorter periods, restricting tribes' ability to use land for long-term economic development and planning.
The proposal
Amends the 1955 Long-Term Leasing Act to allow leases up to 99 years on Mashpee Wampanoag and Wampanoag Aquinnah tribal lands, increasing flexibility for development.
The impact
Mashpee Wampanoag and Wampanoag Aquinnah tribes gain tools for long-term economic projects. Potential lessees get extended lease terms. Federal oversight of tribal land use continues.
Longer leases enable tribes to attract businesses and investors by offering stable, predictable terms. Tribes can pursue larger infrastructure projects like housing, retail, or tourism with confidence in long-term arrangements.
Gives tribes greater control over their land use decisions and economic future. Reduces federal restrictions on tribal sovereignty and allows tribes to manage resources according to their own priorities.
Narrowly applies to two specific tribes rather than broad policy changes. Allows customized approaches based on each tribe's unique needs and circumstances.
99-year leases align with business and infrastructure timelines that require decades to generate returns. Enables tribes to plan generational economic strategies.
99-year leases reduce federal government oversight and accountability over that extended period. Changes in circumstances or tribal leadership may make long-term commitments problematic.
Long leases could lock tribes into disadvantageous deals if market conditions or tribal needs change significantly. Tribes may lack bargaining power with sophisticated commercial lessees.
Only applies to two tribes, creating unequal opportunities compared to other federally recognized tribes. May raise questions about fairness of selective eligibility.
Extended leases could facilitate development that conflicts with environmental protection or cultural preservation. Long-term commercial use might impact sacred sites or ecosystems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.