Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allow death penalty for certain crimes in Washington, DC.
The problem
DC has not had capital punishment since 1962. The bill addresses concerns about serious crimes by proposing restoration of death penalty authority.
The proposal
The bill would reinstate the death penalty in DC for certain crimes. It specifies which offenses qualify and establishes procedures for capital cases.
The impact
Criminal defendants convicted of specified crimes in DC could face death penalty. Legal system, courts, and victims' families would be affected.
Proponents argue the death penalty may deter the most serious crimes from occurring. Some believe it provides justice for victims and families of heinous crimes.
Allows DC to set its own criminal justice policy rather than following federal restrictions. Supporters argue DC residents should decide their own capital punishment laws.
Provides the strongest possible punishment for the most severe offenses. Advocates believe certain crimes warrant the ultimate penalty.
Death is irreversible. DNA evidence and exonerations show innocent people have been executed, and mistakes cannot be corrected after execution.
Capital cases are extremely expensive due to lengthy trials, appeals, and death row housing. Resources could fund other crime prevention methods more cheaply.
Research does not show the death penalty deters crime more than long prison sentences. Many experts say life imprisonment achieves public safety without execution.
Studies show minorities receive death sentences at higher rates than white defendants for similar crimes. This raises fairness and equal protection concerns.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.