Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal funding for programs that help prevent type 2 diabetes.
The problem
Diabetes affects millions of Americans and costs the healthcare system billions annually. Prevention programs have shown success but need continued federal support to expand.
The proposal
The bill extends authorization and funding for the National Diabetes Prevention Program, allowing it to continue operating and potentially reach more people at risk.
The impact
People at risk for diabetes, healthcare providers, and public health agencies benefit from continued prevention resources and screening services.
Diabetes prevention programs reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes through lifestyle changes. This can help millions avoid complications like kidney damage, vision loss, and heart disease.
Preventing diabetes costs less than treating it. Early intervention programs reduce expensive hospital visits and medication needs over time.
These programs have strong evidence showing they work. Studies show participants reduce diabetes risk by significant percentages through weight loss and exercise.
Reauthorization ensures programs continue reaching underserved communities. Continued funding expands locations where people can access free or low-cost prevention services.
Reauthorization requires taxpayer funding. Some argue this adds to federal budget deficits and existing debt.
Results depend on participant commitment and local implementation quality. Not all programs achieve equal success rates or reach intended populations.
Prevention programs focus only on type 2 diabetes. They do not address type 1 diabetes or other chronic disease prevention.
Success depends on participants maintaining lifestyle changes long-term. Many people struggle to sustain exercise and diet modifications after programs end.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.