Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents National Laboratories from hiring certain foreign nationals.
The problem
National Laboratories conduct sensitive defense research. Policymakers may have concerns about foreign nationals accessing classified or sensitive information at these facilities.
The proposal
The bill restricts National Laboratories from admitting certain foreign nationals. Specific restrictions are not detailed in available documentation.
The impact
Foreign nationals seeking research positions affected. Laboratory operations and international collaboration may change. U.S. scientific competitiveness could be impacted.
Restricting foreign access to National Laboratories protects sensitive defense research and classified information. This prevents potential security risks from foreign intelligence gathering.
Limiting foreign nationals' access to cutting-edge research protects American technological innovations and intellectual property. This keeps advanced research from being shared internationally.
Restricting foreign hires may open positions for American citizens and permanent residents. This could increase employment opportunities in high-skilled scientific fields.
International research collaboration drives scientific progress. Restricting foreign scientists may limit access to global talent and slow innovation at National Laboratories.
National Laboratories rely on top talent worldwide. Restrictions could make it harder to hire the best researchers, potentially weakening American research capabilities.
Excluding foreign scientists may strain relationships with allied nations. Other countries might retaliate by restricting American scientists from their facilities.
Without clear definitions of which 'certain foreign nationals' are prohibited, the rule could be applied inconsistently or unfairly to qualified scientists.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.