Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to attract AI talent to the US through visa and immigration changes.
The problem
The US may be losing talented AI workers to other countries. Companies struggle to find enough skilled AI professionals domestically. International competition for tech talent is increasing.
The proposal
Changes immigration rules to make it easier for AI experts to work in America. Likely expands visa categories or speeds up hiring processes for technology workers.
The impact
AI companies, tech workers, and the US tech industry. Foreign-born talent gains clearer pathways. Domestic workers face potential wage or competition effects.
Bringing skilled AI workers strengthens American innovation and competitiveness globally. Companies can fill critical positions faster. The US leads in AI development.
AI industry expansion creates jobs and increases tax revenue. New companies may form. Tech sector productivity rises.
Having the best AI talent keeps America ahead of China and Europe. National security depends on AI superiority. Innovation accelerates.
Increased foreign talent may lower salaries for American tech workers. Job competition increases for domestic AI specialists. Entry-level positions become harder to secure.
Companies may hire foreign experts instead of training Americans. Fewer opportunities for domestic students to enter AI fields. Brain drain of American talent becomes worse.
Other countries might lose talent permanently, creating diplomatic tensions. Developing nations lose future leaders. Global inequality in tech talent widens.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.