Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a training program for community mental wellness workers to expand mental health support services.
The problem
Mental health services are hard to access in many communities. More workers are needed to help people with mental health challenges.
The proposal
The bill establishes a training program to prepare community members as mental wellness workers. They would help people access mental health services and support.
The impact
Community members, people needing mental health care, and local organizations are affected. The program could provide more accessible mental health support.
Training new workers expands who can help people with mental health needs. This could help more people get support in their own communities. Rural and underserved areas might see improved access to services.
The program creates training and employment opportunities for community members. People could learn new skills and find meaningful work helping others.
Community wellness workers typically cost less than licensed mental health professionals. This could reduce overall mental health care expenses while expanding services.
Workers from local communities understand cultural differences and local needs. They may build trust with people who avoid professional mental health services.
Community workers may lack professional training that licensed therapists have. Without clear standards, service quality could vary widely. Some people might need more specialized care than these workers can provide.
Creating a new training program requires government funding and staff. The bill's actual cost to taxpayers is unclear. Other health priorities might compete for the same money.
The bill summary is not available, so specific program details are unknown. It is unclear how many workers would be trained or what the training includes. Budget amounts and implementation timeline are uncertain.
More community workers might reduce job opportunities for licensed mental health professionals. Some areas could face wage pressure if many new workers enter the field.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.