Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents government benefits for family members of convicted criminals.
The problem
Concerns that relatives of convicted individuals may receive federal benefits or assistance improperly. Uncertainty exists about eligibility rules for family members of people with criminal records.
The proposal
The bill would likely restrict or deny federal government benefits and assistance to close family members of individuals convicted of crimes, depending on the relationship and crime type.
The impact
Family members of convicted persons could lose eligibility for federal benefits. Government agencies would need new rules to verify and enforce this restriction.
Could prevent criminals or their close relatives from accessing benefits through deception or improper claims. Aims to ensure taxpayer money goes to eligible individuals without criminal family connections.
Creates additional screening to catch ineligible applicants. May deter attempts to use federal programs improperly.
Establishes clearer rules about who qualifies for federal assistance. Adds a layer of verification to government benefit systems.
Close relatives of convicted persons may lose benefits through no fault of their own. Children, spouses, or elderly parents could face hardship for crimes they didn't commit.
May conflict with constitutional protections against punishing innocent people. Courts have questioned if family members can be penalized for relatives' crimes.
Requires agencies to investigate family relationships and criminal histories for every applicant. Creates administrative burden and expense.
The bill's title uses vague language that could be interpreted many different ways. Unclear rules create confusion and inconsistent application.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.