Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prohibits accepting money or benefits in exchange for presidential pardons or commutations.
The problem
Concerns that wealthy individuals might pay for presidential pardons, undermining justice system integrity and equal treatment under law for all citizens.
The proposal
Makes it illegal to give or receive payment, gifts, or any benefit in exchange for a presidential pardon or sentence reduction. Establishes penalties for violations.
The impact
Affects people seeking pardons, those offering payments, and the public's trust in pardon decisions. Applies federal criminal penalties to violators.
Prevents wealthy individuals from buying their way out of consequences. Ensures pardon decisions are based on merit, not money. Helps maintain public confidence in the justice system.
Creates clear legal penalties for attempted bribery of pardon power. Protects presidential authority from being abused for profit. Makes illegal behavior that undermines government integrity.
Reinforces that no one is above legal consequences based on wealth. Protects the legitimacy of pardon decisions. Maintains public trust in the judicial process.
Explicitly prohibits transactional pardons. Removes ambiguity about what constitutes improper pardon exchanges. Provides clear guidance to prosecutors and law enforcement.
May be difficult to prove someone gave a gift specifically for a pardon. Could criminalize innocent donations or gifts. Enforcement might require proving hidden intent, which is hard.
Pardon power is discretionary and hard to regulate legally. Presidents may be reluctant to enforce against themselves or allies. Difficult to prosecute without clear evidence of agreements.
Doesn't restrict pardon power itself or require transparency. Wealthy people might find indirect ways to influence pardon decisions. Legal prohibition alone may not eliminate corruption attempts.
Could potentially restrict legitimate political speech or lobbying for pardons. May create gray areas between advocacy and bribery. Could complicate First Amendment protections for petition.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.