Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates support services and resources for college students experiencing mental health crises.
The problem
College students face high rates of mental health struggles, depression, and suicide. Many campuses lack adequate crisis support systems and mental health resources.
The proposal
Establishes funding and programs to help colleges provide crisis hotlines, counseling services, and mental health support for students on campus.
The impact
College students gain access to mental health resources. Colleges receive funding to expand counseling services. Campus staff trained in crisis response.
Crisis hotlines and immediate mental health support can prevent suicides and serious harm. Students in distress get help quickly when they need it most.
Better counseling and mental health services help students manage anxiety, depression, and stress. This improves academic performance and overall wellbeing.
Programs teach campus workers to recognize and respond to mental health crises. This creates safer environments across college communities.
Available support services help catch mental health problems early before they become severe. Prevention is more effective than crisis response alone.
The bill requires federal funding that adds to government expenses. Taxpayers bear the cost of new campus mental health programs.
If funding is insufficient, colleges may struggle to fully implement required services. Some campuses might face budget pressures.
Different colleges have different capacities. Rural or smaller schools may find it harder to build robust crisis services than well-funded universities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.