Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires federal audits of state programs that receive federal funding.
The problem
Federal agencies may lack oversight of how states use federal money for programs, potentially leading to waste or misuse of taxpayer funds.
The proposal
Bill establishes audit requirements for federally funded programs run by states, ensuring better accountability and tracking of federal money.
The impact
State administrators, federal agencies, and taxpayers are affected through increased reporting requirements and potential program changes based on audit findings.
Audits help ensure federal funds are actually used as intended. This protects taxpayers from waste and fraud. States get clearer guidance on proper spending.
Regular audits can identify problems before they become expensive. Finding issues quickly saves taxpayer money and improves program effectiveness.
Creates clear responsibility for both federal and state officials. Public records of audits make government more transparent and trustworthy.
Audit results provide feedback states can use to run programs better. States can learn from findings and strengthen operations.
States must pay for more audits and reporting. This increases administrative costs that could reduce money for actual programs.
State staff spend more time on reporting and compliance. This takes resources away from actually running programs and helping people.
States may lose flexibility to manage their own programs. Strict federal audit rules could limit how states customize programs for local needs.
Audit requirements might slow down program implementation and changes. States could move more slowly responding to community needs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.