Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates legal protections against harassment and intimidation during elections.
The problem
Election workers and participants face harassment and intimidation that may discourage civic participation and threaten election security.
The proposal
Establishes legal defenses and protections for individuals involved in elections against harassment and intimidation claims or actions.
The impact
Election workers, voters, and poll observers gain legal protection. May affect those accused of election-related harassment or intimidation.
Election officials and poll workers could work safely without fear of harassment or threats. This may encourage more people to volunteer in election administration. Safer elections strengthen democracy.
Voters and observers may participate more freely without intimidation concerns. Protection encourages civic engagement and election monitoring. More participation strengthens democratic processes.
Election workers have reported increased harassment and threats in recent years. Legal protections respond to documented problems. Clear defenses help prosecute actual intimidation.
Broad harassment definitions might restrict legitimate political speech or election criticism. People could face legal action for protected expression. Balance between protection and speech rights unclear.
Without official bill text, unclear what counts as harassment or intimidation legally. Vague laws create confusion and inconsistent enforcement. Different courts might interpret protections differently.
Legal defenses might protect election workers accused of misconduct. Some could use protections to avoid accountability for actual problems. Could shield bad actors from consequences.
No details available on how protections work or who enforces them. Unclear what agencies handle disputes or complaints. Enforcement could be uneven across states.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.