Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes rules for how emerging technologies are developed and used responsibly.
The problem
New technologies like artificial intelligence raise concerns about safety, privacy, and ethics. Clear rules are needed to guide responsible development.
The proposal
Creates oversight and standards for emerging technologies. Establishes requirements for safety testing and impact assessment before widespread use.
The impact
Technology companies, government agencies, researchers, and the public are affected by new requirements and standards for technology development.
Requiring safety testing before technologies are released could prevent harm to people. This helps ensure emerging tech doesn't create unintended dangers.
Standards for emerging tech can protect privacy and prevent discrimination. Clear rules help ensure technologies don't violate people's fundamental rights.
Businesses benefit from knowing the rules upfront. Clear standards reduce confusion and allow companies to plan responsibly.
When people know technologies are regulated and tested, they trust them more. This encourages adoption of beneficial innovations.
Strict requirements and testing could slow down technology development. Companies might delay releasing helpful new tools.
Meeting new standards requires spending on compliance, testing, and reporting. This could burden smaller companies more than large ones.
Overly general regulations could apply to technologies they weren't meant for. This risks limiting beneficial innovation in unexpected ways.
Emerging technologies change quickly, making rules hard to keep current. Enforcement could be inconsistent across different companies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.