Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes a federal minimum wage standard for all workers across the United States.
The problem
Current federal minimum wage has not kept pace with cost of living increases, leaving many full-time workers struggling to afford basic expenses like housing and food.
The proposal
Bill would set a new federal minimum wage requirement. Specific wage amount and implementation timeline not detailed in available information.
The impact
Affects all minimum wage workers, small businesses, large employers, and consumers. Changes wage requirements and potential business costs nationwide.
Workers earning minimum wage would receive increased pay, improving their ability to cover living expenses and reducing reliance on government assistance programs.
A living wage helps narrow the gap between lowest and highest earners, potentially promoting more economic equity across income levels.
Workers with higher wages spend more money on goods and services in their communities, potentially boosting local economies and creating additional business demand.
A living wage could lift some families out of poverty and reduce need for public assistance, lowering government costs for welfare programs.
Higher labor costs may lead some employers to hire fewer workers, reduce hours, or eliminate positions, particularly in low-margin businesses.
Small businesses with tight profit margins may struggle more to absorb increased labor costs compared to large corporations with greater financial resources.
Businesses may raise prices for consumers to offset higher wage costs, potentially reducing purchasing power gains for minimum wage workers.
A uniform federal wage ignores significant cost-of-living differences between expensive cities and affordable rural areas, potentially being insufficient in some places and excessive in others.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.