Latest action: Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Elise Stefanik (R-NY)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Authorizes a settlement agreement resolving the Akwesasne Mohawk land claim in New York.
The problem
The Akwesasne Mohawk Nation has an unresolved land claim in New York State that has created ongoing disputes between the tribe, state, and federal governments.
The proposal
Congress will ratify and confirm a settlement and compromise agreement between the Akwesasne Mohawk Nation and relevant parties to resolve the historical land claim.
The impact
The Akwesasne Mohawk Nation, New York State, and affected landowners will be bound by the settlement terms, which may affect land ownership, tribal sovereignty, and resource rights.
Resolving this claim provides certainty and closure after years of conflict. Both the Mohawk Nation and other parties can move forward without ongoing litigation costs.
A settlement can establish clear acknowledgment of Akwesasne Mohawk rights and self-governance. This validates tribal authority and historical claims.
Settling avoids expensive court battles for federal and state governments. Resources can be redirected to other priorities.
A settlement may provide land, resources, or compensation that supports tribal economic development and community investment.
Current property owners may face title changes or restrictions on land use depending on settlement terms. This could affect property values and future use rights.
The federal government's financial obligations under the settlement are unclear. Taxpayers may fund compensation or ongoing tribal programs.
Without an official summary, citizens cannot fully understand the settlement terms. Public transparency about what Congress is ratifying is limited.
New York State may disagree with federal settlement terms. This could create ongoing tension over implementation and jurisdiction.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.