Latest action: Subcommittee Hearings Held
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Melanie Stansbury (D-NM)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Expands healthcare provider options for Native American communities served by Indian Health Service.
The problem
Native American communities may have limited access to healthcare providers through Indian Health Service facilities, affecting quality and availability of medical care.
The proposal
Increases number and types of healthcare providers that can deliver services to IHS patients, likely through expanded hiring, partnerships, or provider network changes.
The impact
Native Americans using IHS services gain better access to doctors and healthcare. Healthcare providers get new job opportunities. IHS budgets may change.
Expanding providers means Native American patients may wait less time to see doctors and get care. More providers can deliver services in remote or underserved tribal areas.
Expanding provider positions creates employment opportunities for doctors, nurses, and other medical staff. This can help both Native American and non-Native healthcare professionals.
More providers mean patients receive faster diagnosis and treatment. Better access to preventive care can reduce serious health problems and improve community wellness.
Expands IHS capacity to fulfill its responsibility to provide healthcare to Native Americans. Shows commitment to tribal sovereignty and self-determination.
Hiring more providers and expanding services costs federal money. Taxpayers fund IHS, so expansion could increase national budget demands.
Recruiting qualified providers to work in remote tribal areas is difficult. Training and coordinating new staff takes time and resources.
Rapid expansion could make it hard to maintain consistent healthcare quality. Oversight of new providers and programs requires additional management.
Without an official summary, the bill's specific methods and funding sources are unknown. Unspecified details make it hard to assess real impacts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.