Latest action: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5144)
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Transfers federal land to Southcentral Foundation in Alaska for community development.
The problem
Southcentral Foundation needs land to expand services and programs for Alaska communities. Current federal ownership limits development of healthcare and social services facilities.
The proposal
Bill transfers specific federal land parcels to Southcentral Foundation, an Alaska Native nonprofit organization, for use in expanding regional health and community programs.
The impact
Southcentral Foundation gains land for expansion. Alaska communities may access more healthcare services. Federal government reduces land holdings. Local economies may benefit from development.
Southcentral Foundation can build new medical facilities on transferred land. This expands healthcare services for rural and underserved Alaska communities. Better access to healthcare improves public health outcomes.
Transferring land to an Alaska Native organization supports indigenous economic growth. Foundation can develop the land for jobs and community benefit. Strengthens Alaska Native self-determination and sovereignty.
Foundation-managed land may serve community needs better than federal ownership. Allows local organization to make decisions about local resources. Could improve service delivery to remote communities.
Federal government no longer manages these specific land parcels. Transfers responsibility to Foundation. May reduce taxpayer burden for land administration.
Federal government surrenders management authority over these lands. Cannot enforce federal environmental or public access standards. Future uses are determined solely by Foundation.
Private nonprofit management may not prioritize environmental protection. Federal lands typically have stronger conservation requirements. Development could impact wildlife or natural resources.
Federal lands are generally open to public use. Private ownership may restrict public hunting, fishing, or recreation access. Communities could lose traditional use rights.
Foundation decision-making may not be as public as federal processes. Alaska communities may have less say in how land is developed. Future changes could happen without broad public input.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.