Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands mental health treatment options and access for Americans.
The problem
Many Americans struggle to find affordable mental health care. Shortages of mental health providers and limited treatment options make it hard for people to get help.
The proposal
The bill increases mental health care options by expanding who can provide services and improving access to treatment. It likely affects funding and regulations for mental health programs.
The impact
Mental health patients, healthcare providers, insurance companies, and taxpayers may be affected through changed access, costs, and treatment availability.
Expanding mental health options gives patients more ways to get care. People could access therapy, counseling, or other treatments that fit their needs better.
Rural and low-income communities often lack mental health services. This bill may help bring more providers and services to areas where people currently struggle to find care.
Better mental health care can prevent more serious health problems later. Treating mental illness early might lower overall healthcare spending for hospitals and insurance companies.
More accessible mental health services benefit communities. Better mental health care may reduce emergency room visits and improve overall well-being.
Expanding mental health services may require more taxpayer funding. The government might need to pay more for new programs and services.
Rapidly expanding options could lower standards if not carefully managed. New providers might not have enough training or oversight.
Changes might affect insurance coverage and costs for patients. Some people could face higher premiums if insurers must cover new services.
Expanding mental health care systems takes time and coordination. Some areas may struggle to hire enough providers or set up new services quickly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.