Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects and expands access to in vitro fertilization treatments nationwide.
The problem
Some states restrict IVF access through laws limiting embryo use or fertility treatments. Patients face barriers obtaining reproductive services depending on where they live.
The proposal
Establishes a federal right to IVF access and requires states to permit fertility treatments. Protects patients and providers from state-level restrictions on IVF procedures.
The impact
Fertility patients, women, couples, medical providers, and state governments face changes in IVF availability and regulatory requirements across the country.
Patients in all states gain access to IVF treatment regardless of local laws. This helps people who struggle to have biological children pursue parenthood through assisted reproduction.
Doctors and clinics cannot face penalties for offering IVF services. This allows healthcare professionals to practice without conflicting state restrictions.
Removes barriers allowing fertility clinics to operate nationwide without state-specific restrictions. This enables business growth and creates jobs in reproductive healthcare.
Prevents wealthy patients from traveling to other states for treatment. Ensures access based on medical need rather than geography or income.
Some argue healthcare should be decided by states, not federal government. This shifts reproductive policy decisions away from local elected representatives.
May override state laws protecting embryos or reflecting local moral and religious values. Creates legal conflicts between federal and state authority.
States may face costly requirements to change existing regulations and legal frameworks. Enforcement across different state systems could prove complicated and expensive.
Some groups object to IVF based on religious or ethical beliefs about embryos. The law may conflict with deeply held values in certain communities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.