Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
S 5209 establishes performance standards for federal government agencies and operations.
The problem
Federal agencies may lack clear performance metrics and accountability standards for delivering services effectively and efficiently to the American public.
The proposal
The bill would require federal agencies to establish and meet performance benchmarks, report on their progress, and implement accountability measures for government operations.
The impact
Federal employees, taxpayers, and citizens receiving government services would be affected through potential changes to how agencies operate and report results.
Clear performance standards could help agencies identify and fix ineffective programs. This could reduce waste and ensure taxpayer dollars are used more effectively.
Requiring agencies to report performance metrics creates transparency. Lawmakers and citizens can see whether agencies are meeting their goals.
Performance standards may encourage agencies to improve service delivery. Citizens could experience faster, more reliable government services.
Performance data helps identify which programs work well and which need improvement. This supports better policy decisions.
Establishing new performance systems requires funding for staff, technology, and training. Agencies may need budget increases or reallocation.
Adding reporting requirements could distract agencies from actual work. Staff time spent on metrics reporting is time not spent on services.
Agencies might focus narrowly on measurable metrics while neglecting harder-to-measure goals. This could create perverse incentives.
Different agencies serve different missions. Uniform performance standards might not work well for all federal functions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.