Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reduces federal government size and spending through workforce and agency reforms.
The problem
Some believe federal government is too large, inefficient, and wasteful with taxpayer money. Critics want streamlined operations and reduced government scope.
The proposal
Bill likely aims to reduce federal employees, consolidate agencies, eliminate programs, or decrease government spending. Exact provisions unclear without full text availability.
The impact
Federal workers, government agencies, federal benefit recipients, and taxpayers would be affected. Changes depend on final bill language and implementation.
Smaller government could lower federal spending and reduce tax burden on some citizens. Streamlined operations might eliminate wasteful programs and duplicate services.
Consolidating agencies could reduce bureaucracy and speed up services. Fewer layers of management might improve decision-making and reduce red tape.
Smaller government workforce typically means fewer regulations on businesses and individuals. This could encourage private sector growth and innovation.
Streamlined government may be easier to monitor and hold accountable. Clearer organizational structures could improve transparency and performance tracking.
Workforce reductions would eliminate government jobs and impact employees' livelihoods. Affected workers face unemployment and loss of benefits.
Smaller government could mean slower processing, fewer resources for agencies, and reduced services. Citizens might experience delays in benefits, permits, and assistance.
Job cuts in federal workforce ripple through local economies, especially in cities with many government offices. Reduced spending affects businesses that serve federal workers.
Without specific details, outcome is unpredictable. Poorly designed cuts could harm essential services while leaving waste untouched.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.