Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires parental approval before young people can use social media platforms.
The problem
Young people spend significant time on social media. Concerns exist about impacts on mental health, privacy, and age-appropriate content exposure.
The proposal
The bill would require social media companies to obtain parental consent before minors can create or use accounts on their platforms.
The impact
Minors, parents, social media companies, and online businesses are affected by new account verification and parental notification requirements.
Parents gain ability to monitor and approve their children's social media use. This allows families to make informed decisions about online activities.
Parental involvement may reduce exposure to predators, cyberbullying, and harmful content. Added oversight creates another protective layer for young users.
Limiting social media access through parental gates could reduce excessive screen time. This may help address concerns about youth anxiety and depression linked to social media.
Companies would establish clearer age-checking systems. This creates consistent industry practices and prevents underage access.
Social media companies face high costs developing parental consent systems. This creates technical and administrative challenges for compliance.
Verifying parental identity requires collecting personal information. This raises data privacy risks and potential misuse of family information.
Young people lose autonomy to make online decisions independently. Older teens may feel their privacy and maturity are not respected.
Minors can bypass parental approval using false information or other accounts. International platforms face jurisdiction and enforcement difficulties.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.