Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Authorizes funding and operations for the Rural Community Opioid Response program.
The problem
Rural areas lack adequate resources to address opioid addiction and overdose crises. Communities need sustained federal support for treatment and prevention efforts.
The proposal
The bill reauthorizes the RCORP program, enabling continued federal funding for rural opioid response initiatives including treatment, recovery support, and prevention activities.
The impact
Rural communities, healthcare providers, and people struggling with opioid addiction benefit from sustained program funding and services.
Reauthorization ensures rural areas maintain federal funding for addiction treatment services. Many rural regions lack private treatment options, making federal support critical. Consistent funding allows programs to retain staff and serve vulnerable populations.
Authorization provides multi-year certainty for rural healthcare providers and community organizations. Programs can plan long-term initiatives and hire permanent staff rather than relying on year-to-year funding uncertainty.
Federal funding supports local jobs in rural healthcare and social services sectors. Money flows to rural pharmacies, clinics, and community organizations addressing the opioid crisis.
RCORP has demonstrated measurable outcomes in reducing overdose deaths. Reauthorization allows proven interventions to expand and reach more rural residents.
Without an official summary, the bill's specific funding levels and program parameters remain unknown. Insufficient authorization levels could limit program expansion or adequacy of services.
Reauthorization requires ongoing federal expenditure during budget constraints. Costs may compete with other healthcare priorities or require budget adjustments elsewhere.
Without seeing bill details, oversight mechanisms, performance metrics, or accountability measures are unclear. Programs may lack adequate evaluation frameworks or reporting requirements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.