Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires the president to publicly explain and justify all pardons issued.
The problem
Presidents can issue pardons with little public explanation. This limits accountability and public understanding of pardon decisions.
The proposal
The bill would require the president to provide written reasons for each pardon. Details would be published publicly within a set timeframe.
The impact
Presidents, Congress, and the public would have more information about pardon decisions. Legal challenges to pardon authority could increase.
The bill would require presidents to explain their pardon decisions in writing. This lets citizens and Congress understand why people receive pardons. More transparency can build public trust in government.
Requiring explanations could discourage presidents from issuing questionable pardons. It creates accountability by forcing leaders to justify their decisions. This protects against potential corruption or favoritism.
Congress could review pardon reasons and investigate problems. This strengthens checks and balances between branches of government.
Written explanations provide evidence if someone challenges a pardon in court. This could prevent illegal or unconstitutional pardon abuse.
The Constitution gives presidents broad pardon power without conditions. This bill could interfere with that power. Some argue it weakens the executive branch.
Presidents would need to write detailed explanations for every pardon. This takes time and resources from other executive duties.
If explanations are required and public, presidents may issue fewer pardons. This could prevent deserving people from receiving mercy.
Opponents could pressure presidents to deny pardons for political reasons. The public nature of explanations could increase partisan attacks.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.