Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 537.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires colleges to disclose more information about costs, outcomes, and student debt to help families make informed decisions.
The problem
Students and families struggle to compare colleges fairly. Schools report different information in different ways. Students often graduate with unexpected debt levels and unclear career outcomes.
The proposal
The bill requires colleges to publish standardized information about tuition, fees, graduation rates, employment outcomes, and average student debt in a consistent format.
The impact
Students and families get clearer college data. Schools must spend time organizing and reporting information. Potential employers and policymakers gain insight into educational quality.
Families can compare colleges more easily using the same information format. Students understand costs and job outcomes before enrolling. This helps people choose schools that match their goals and finances.
Clear debt information helps students avoid borrowing more than necessary. Graduates know what to expect financially. This may lower default rates and financial hardship after graduation.
Colleges must show real results, not just marketing claims. Poor-performing schools face pressure to improve. Taxpayers and students can see how institutions spend money and serve students.
Standardized data helps low-income and first-generation students understand college value. Transparency reduces information gaps between wealthy and disadvantaged families. This promotes fairer college choice.
Colleges must invest in data systems and staff time to report information. Smaller schools face higher relative costs. These expenses may be passed to students through higher tuition.
Transparency shows outcomes but not quality of education. Test scores and employment rates don't capture learning value. Schools may game data or focus only on measurable metrics.
Different schools serve different students with different needs. Comparing outcomes without context can unfairly hurt schools serving disadvantaged populations. Rankings based on data may mislead students.
Critics argue colleges should control their own reporting without federal mandates. One-size-fits-all requirements may not fit diverse institutions. States and accreditors already collect some data.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.