Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to strengthen doctoral science talent development and retention in the United States.
The problem
The U.S. faces challenges attracting and keeping top PhD-level scientists and researchers in competitive global markets.
The proposal
Creates programs to support doctoral talent in science fields through funding, scholarships, and career development initiatives.
The impact
PhD students and early-career scientists benefit from support. Universities and research institutions gain resources. U.S. competitiveness in science may improve.
Supporting PhD students helps develop skilled researchers needed for innovation. A stronger talent pipeline keeps scientific expertise in the United States. This supports long-term competitiveness in technology and discovery.
More PhD talent supports universities and research institutions. This can lead to more breakthroughs, patents, and scientific advancement. Better-funded research programs attract top minds.
Creates career pathways for scientists in academia and industry. Helps fill shortage of specialized PhD workers. Supports economic growth through skilled labor.
Strengthens U.S. position in global science competition. Countries investing in talent development lead in innovation. Helps maintain technological and research advantages.
New programs require federal funding and budget allocation. Costs may grow over time as programs expand. Other priorities may lose funding.
Bill focuses on PhD talent but doesn't address broader STEM workforce needs. May not help high school or undergrad STEM education. Narrow focus might miss systemic problems.
Creating new federal programs requires bureaucratic structure and oversight. Delays possible before benefits reach students. Effectiveness depends on program design and execution.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.